« Michael Chabon's "Manhood for Amateurs" | Main | New York Memories »

May 26, 2010

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Kristine Alpi

Could you please list the panelists and their affiliations at the beginning or the end of your post for the record? Thanks! Also, what questions did the audience have?

Marcus

Hi Kris. Here' the panelist info:

1. Susan Starr, Editor, JMLA
2. Eric Schnell, Associate Professor, Prior Health Sciences University Library, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
3. Melissa Rethlefsen, Education Technology Librarian, Mayo Clinic Library, Rochester, MN
4. Rachel Walden, Librarian, Eskind Biomedical Library, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN

Questions/Comments--I can recall two now, but I believe everything was recorded:

1. Elizabeth Lund from MLA stated that the print publication process is a minor part of delays from article submission to publication; most lag is due to the review process.

2. Karen Butter from UCSF stated that we need some form of peer review, in response to Eric Schnell's observation that traditional peer review was more of a management mechanism than a quality filtering process. Eric agreed that we need peer review, but argued that it can be in different forms than before.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Published Pieces

March 2015

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31