"When you are first published at a young age, your writing grows with you--and in public. Changing My Mind seemed an apt, confessional title to describe this process. Reading through the pieces, though, I'm forced to recognize that ideological inconsistency is, for me, practically an article of faith."--Zadie Smith, Changing My Mind, 2009
Last week I bought Zadie Smith's new collection of essays, Changing My Mind. My main motivation was to read her moving tribute to David Foster Wallace. However, I also identified with her defense of ideological inconsistency. To me this is a a sign of a mind alive, and if the cost is wishy-washiness or "flip-flopping" then so be it.
Forever now I've called myself a "liberal," and in American political terms I suppose I am. But now I live in a city surrounded by fellow US liberals, and I find SF politics to be nauseating more than revolutionary. Groupthink can set in all along the political spectrum, and we've got it bad here. So these days it's fun to more fun to tweak the left than to agree with it. But when I go to visit family in Arizona I turn on the leftie card like a switch. That's McCain country, after all.
So, in some ways "ideological consistency" simply means the ability to be a chameleon. More important, and worthy, is the capacity to maintain firm convictions while possessing the ability to change your mind after hearing new perspectives or simply "growing up." Values should be constant, but not views on specific issues. Everyone has to strike their own balance between "standing firm" and changing their mind, and I err strongly on the side of mind-changing. This is yet another reason why I shouldn't be a politician.
Recent Comments